Saturday, July 16, 2005

 

National Vanguard Boycotts Home Depot


Image hosted by Photobucket.com
National Vanguard is currently boycotting The Home Depot stores after allegations that the company funds "day labor centers" that enable the hiring of illegal Mexican immigrants.  The above picture displays a mixture of California-area National Vanguard members and a handful of folks from SaveOurState.org as they protest in front of a Home Depot store in Santa Clarita, California.  Thanks to April Gaede's boyfriend, Mark H., for writing an informative article.

Santa Clarita was a highly strategic location to select for a protest of this nature.  It is a newer, rapidly-growing city located in northern Los Angeles county.  The city was first incorporated in 1987 and is filled with newer suburban homes and high-quality shopping centers along a vast expanse of mountains.  Santa Clarita's racial makeup is approximately eighty percent Caucasian and twenty percent non-white Hispanic, with a trivially negligible population of other races.  On the interstate 5 freeway I drive past the Santa Clarita Valley districts of Castaic, Valencia, Newhall, and Stevenson Ranch on a daily basis.  This city is seventy miles south of Bakersfield, Prussian Blue's rapidly-growing city of residence.     

Comments:
Wow, neo-Nazis don't like it - that'll show the Home Depot!
 
You know that Jews killed 600,000,000 white people? I mean, I really had no ideas that the Jews were responsible for Oscar Yeager and his ilk wanking off to pictures of Lynx and Lamb. Now I know.

Oh, well, Sayuri Anzu killed a lot of people who could have been anything from 1/16th to 5/8th Jewish. But I don't hate her for it.
 
I found a video that is somewhat on topic of the latest blog entry, even though the guy in the video looks awful Jewish, it is funny nonetheless:

http://66.90.101.52/ownagevideos.com/how%20to%20get%20rid%20of%20mexicans.wmv
 
Were you attempting to be hilarious with that comment, Kamandi? If that was the case, I wholeheartedly enjoy your sense of humor.
 
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
 
http://66.90.101.52/ownagevideos.com/how%20to%20get%20rid%20of%20mexicans.wmv

WTF?

That was just wrong.
 

That Mansa Musa said...
http://66.90.101.52/ownagevideos.com/how%20to%20get%20rid%20of%20mexicans.wmv

WTF?

That was just wrong.


Oscar Yeager says...
Wrong? To bring illegals to the immigration center?
So now your promoting the infiltration of illegals?

I am against legal immigration as well, but I thought even you guys would be against illegal immigration.

That is about as inoffensive of a post that I can possibly manage, you guys will find something wrong with everything.
 
I am against illegal immigration and feel they should either enter the nation legally or be deported.
 
"I am against illegal immigration and feel they should either enter the nation legally or be deported."

Agreed. That guy in the video however was an asshole. Illegal or not he treated those people like animals and endangered their lives by accelerating over speed bumps. He better quit doing that shit before he runs into La EME.
 
I'm sure the video was as phony as a 3 dollar bill anyhow, it had to be staged.
 
An uncle of mine, from Mexico (married into the family), is dead set against illegals. He came to this country legally so he basically ends up with less rights than the illegals.
 
Are you referring to Uncle Aldo?
 
"I'm sure the video was as phony as a 3 dollar bill anyhow, it had to be staged."

It did seem a bit silly.
 
Eh, I'd rather have a bunch of people who don't speak English very well than a bunch of Oscar Yeager wannabes stomping around and listening to Prussian Blue.

In fact, if any people from Southeast Asia want to come here, I'm perfectly willing to balance out our gain in population by deporting a skinhead.
 
I am all for immigration, and I have no problem with North America welcoming more citzens from Central and South America. Welcome to the western hemisphere, folks.

However I also believe that countries do have the right to set up basic rules of immigration to make the system fair for everybody. As long as those rules are fair and not discriminatory I am fine. How do I feel about "Illegal immigration"? Well, the word "illegal" basically says it all for me. If people don't like the rules, then let's change them by all means-- but there has to be some kind of an agreement to abide by whatever rules are in place. Otherwise they don't really mean anything.

That said, most of the arguments I hear against "illegal immigration" sound to me like garden variety racism, riddled with misinformation and outright lies. What's going on near the borders is *not* helpful.

Speaking as a New Englander here of course-- I am not particularly close to this issue.
 
Mark H.'s article isn't very informative however-- "day laborers"? Uhmmm... it sounds like they are working there *legally*, right?

Therefore they are not "illegal aliens". I could of course be wrong about this.
 
See, the thing is Markie doesn't care that they're here legally. What matters is they have DARK SKIN, and that mustn't happen.

The Gaede Bitches are apparently leaving Bakersfield.
 
Well Yama, that is exactly the point. If someone is here legally-- and willing to work at the very jobs that Home Depot has trouble filling BTW-- then they are here legally. I have no problem with that.

Mark H. just doesn't seem to have his facts straight.
 
An uncle of mine, from Mexico (married into the family), is dead set against illegals. He came to this country legally so he basically ends up with less rights than the illegals

What "right" do the illegals have that he does not?
 

Yo said...

Mark H.'s article isn't very informative however-- "day laborers"? Uhmmm... it sounds like they are working there *legally*, right?

Therefore they are not "illegal aliens". I could of course be wrong about this.

Well Yama, that is exactly the point. If someone is here legally-- and willing to work at the very jobs that Home Depot has trouble filling BTW-- then they are here legally. I have no problem with that.


Oscar Yeager says...

I think you all are greatly misinformed of the situation here with the Home Depot, and I'll agree with you that Mark didn't make this point clear in his article, but my understanding of the situation is that the illegal Mexicans were using the parking lots of various Home Depots to congregate, and look for work.

That is why I earlier provided you with the link to a funny video, and told you all that it was relevant to the topic, although it didn't actually take place at a Home Depot, but a similiar situation.

But now it's obvious that I nor National Vanguard did not drive the point home hard enough, maybe this will straighten you guys and gals out.....

They were not actual employees of Home Depot, they were there the idea being that many people go there to pick up supplies they need for a home improvement, or construction job, and they then would see the nest of illegals on the other end of the lot, and would approach them and hire them for low wages to do the work for them.

I agree 100% with you guys that Mark did not make this point clear, therefore I will resist the temptation to call you people STUPID.

I can make my point clear by quoting from the National Vanguard website here below however.....



National Vanguard Website says:

Home Depot claims they don't hire illegals, but the White American protesters say hiring by the store itself isn't the main issue. "They may hire some illegals at some stores, but that's not why we're here,"

"What they do is provide funding for -- and actually allow their facilities to be used by -- 'day labor centers' where Mestizos congregate waiting to be picked up by contractors, etc., who get both supplies and cheap non-White labor at Home Depot now. That is the real problem. And Home Depot commits this treason against America just to attract the contractors and their shekels."

 
So tell me Oscar. How do you feel about LEGAL immigration?
 
I oppose the legal immigration of non-whites.

I would not mind the immigration of whites.

I think the anti-white hate act of 1965 was a horrible mistake, well I shouldn't call it a mistake, it was done on purpose.

Of course they don't call it that, it is officially called the 1965 Hart-Celler Act, but I like to call a spade a spade, and so I call it the anti-white hate act.
 
Yep, thought so. An Oi Boy comes illegally from Russia and beats up someone from Laos or Ethiopia who came here legally, and you'd probably be fine with it.


FUCK YOU, OSCAR.
 
Yama,
Lose the stereotypes.
 
Some food for thought, since I am in an analytical mood:

On one of the websites I found today, it said that there are 10 million illegal immigrants working in this country-- mostly doing the crappy jobs that Americans don't want because it pays more than work at home. Census 2000 results indicate that there between 8 and 11 million illegal aliens living-- and working AND paying taxes-- in the United States in 2000. The vast majority will work here for a period of time, save money, and then return to their home countries where they will buy property with the money they have earned.

If we figure 10% of our income is taxed out to Social Security, an illegal worker earning $250/week is paying $25/week into Social Security. Multiply that by 10 million, that's $250 million a week or $12 billion a year paid into Social Security by those who will never draw upon its benefits. And that's assuming that everyone involved makes $250 a week. Fern cutters in Florida tend to make much more.

Our country's economic and Social Security sytems would very likely collapse without illegal immigrants.

Anyway, back to our regularly scheduled program.
 
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
 
Mark H. did not make his point clear because, very likely, Mark H. is not very bright. Whatever.

I think the real issue here is not illegal immigration but Americans who attempt to exploit illegal immigrants by hiring them under the table, at less than the legal rates, and not paying thier taxes properly. That's garden variety greed.

It also by the way debunks the NA contention that illegal aliens come here and use up resources that should be goin to tax payers-- if they could do that, they wouldn't be taking these crap jobs. The fact is they *can't*-- buit if they work at jobs where taxes are being withheld, they are effectively paying for goverment programs that they will always be excluded from.
 
I've often heard the argument that illegals are filling the jobs that no one else wants, but that's hogwash.

The jobs would get filled one way or the other, and with a higher salary to boot.

And their are proposed agreements between the U.S. and Mexico that would provide U.S. Social Security benefits to hundreds of thousands of Mexicans.

America got along just fine before there was a flood of illegals coming here and social security will not collapse, it's a Jew program that will just get more bloated as time goes on.

The Chilean system is much better, but anytime you talk about privatization people become paranoid and think they are going to get screwed and so nothing ever changes.
 
The jobs would be filled one way or another but at a higher rate? Pffft. This is why companies are outsourcing, Oscar-- the higher rates would put them in the poorhouse. Welcome to the world economy.

As for the illegal immigarnts, they are not here for benefits (which would be substistance level even if they were eligible to get them)-- they are here to work, and typically take jobs at the companies that are "always hiring." This benefits our economy, and directly results in more resources for people who are currently collecting social security-- disbaled and elderly citizens.

As for the proposed agreements-- doubtful that they will go through, but really is it fair to take social security payyments from people but *never* pay them benefits (which is what we currently do)? Obviously it is a system that needs reform, but this is a separate issue from immigration.
 
There are plenty of illegals who come over here with medical problems and put a drain on our resources.

They know the hospitals cannot turn them down.

Companies have to outsource only because everyone else is doing it, ban outsourcing and everyone is back on a level playing field.
 
"Lose the stereotypes. "

I wasn't being stereotypical. I'm just saying if Oscar's counterpart over in Russia or Belarus came over here, he'd be perfectly happy.
 
Oscar you are ignorant. Nothing you are saying has any validity at all. Companies outsource to cut costs, and in many cases to stay in business, and hospitals absolutely can turn people down who cannot pay and who have no insurance.

You do not know what you are talking about.
 
No, you are the one who's wrong, in most areas hospitals are required to give medical attention to anyone who seeks it, regardless of their ability to pay.
 
"I wasn't being stereotypical. I'm just saying if Oscar's counterpart over in Russia or Belarus came over here, he'd be perfectly happy."
Sorry , But White nationalism is dying in the former SU . And belarus is mearly a joke
 
Well, if it is dying there, good to know. From what I've heard, it's still a serious problem.
 
Hospitals are only required to give emergency services to anyone that enters, and nothing more.

Once they've exhausted emergency care, they can be rejected.
 
Oh, as if that's no big deal.
 
It's not AS big a deal, but, nonetheless, it's a problem with illegal immigration.

However, it's not an argument against LEGAL immigration.
 
"I oppose the legal immigration of non-whites.

I would not mind the immigration of whites."

And do you not consider that to be supremacist? Basically, you do not recognize the equality of citizenship that is the fabric of American society. Who are you to complain about ethnic interests when you do not believe in equal citizenship. Why should someone take your beliefs into consideration when you hold such a value? I commend you for admitting you are a racist because that is precisely what you are. White Nationalists would do well to embrace honesty and admit their ideology is racist rather than hiding behind feel good terms such as "heritage not hate", "racialism" and "preservation". You might value all of those but it is dishonest to not admit you are a racist.
 
I don't consider it supremacist, my whole reasoning is that there are differences between the races, and I want to live with people who have the same beliefs, goals, morals, etc. as me.

90% of blacks vote for democrats, I tend to be more libertarian, the founding fathers had libertarian ideology, why would I want to live among people who do not share my ideology?

They don't vote like us, they don't think like us.

And I'm a Christian, and so it upsets me that Jews are taught to spit three times when they pass a Christian cemetary, and that their Talmud says Jesus is in hell boiling in semen, and that the math books in Israel use a "T" instead of a "+" sign, because the + too closely resembles a Christian cross.

If that is not hateful supremacism by the Jews, I don't know what is, and I don't want to live with them because of it.
 
And I'm a Christian, and so it upsets me that Jews are taught to spit three times when they pass a Christian cemetary, and that their Talmud says Jesus is in hell boiling in semen, and that the math books in Israel use a "T" instead of a "+" sign, because the + too closely resembles a Christian cross.

All of these things are myths, perpetuated by Israel Shakak.
 
"I don't consider it supremacist, my whole reasoning is that there are differences between the races, and I want to live with people who have the same beliefs, goals, morals, etc. as me."

Most White Americans do not share your beliefs on race. There is no legitimate reason to oppose the legal immigration of people of color based on values, values are diverse among groups of people.

"90% of blacks vote for democrats, I tend to be more libertarian, the founding fathers had libertarian ideology, why would I want to live among people who do not share my ideology?

They don't vote like us, they don't think like us."


I don't believe Republicans (which because of the NeoCons I know most WNs have decided to abandon) are any more libertarian than Democrats and White people are divided between the two beliefs so close to half of White America votes the same way Black America votes therefore they do indeed vote like a fair share of Whites. I am Black I took a political test to determine my values.

http://www.politicalcompass.org/?

I believe the outcome of the test determined that I was a social libertarian in close proximity to someone like Bill Clinton a moderate democrat which I believe most Black Americans are, Bill Clinton was jokingly referred to as the first Black president and even inducted into the Black hall of fame. Libertarianism is defined as someone who advocates maximizing individual rights and minimizing the role of the state, basically believing that this promotes free will. Democrats tend to believe that it is the governments job to help people help themselves, getting them into position to be more indepent while Republicans support people who more so have the luxury of being independent at the expense of those who don't. I should take the test to see where they determine you poltically beliefs lie. I don't think values are necessairly a good source for citing reasons to advocate racial separation.


"And I'm a Christian, and so it upsets me that Jews are taught...."

You might want to stop reading garbage you find on the internet and in hate books. This type of thing is right up there with some Blacks believing White people invented HIV to destroy them.
 
They didn't - it's the Jewish doctors that injected black babies with AIDS. :)
 
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
 
There is very little difference between the dems and repubs, in the sense that they are both promoting the destruction of the white race.

The democrats spent years trying to kiss the ass of the black race, and more recently the republicans have been trying to counter by turning a blind eye to the Mexican invasion
to pick up votes from them.

I was disgusted when Bill Clinton gave that speech and mentioned that whites would be the minority in America in a certain year in the not too distant future, and the whole room burst into applause.

Many of them were whites, who have been taught that they are second class citizens who ought to feel guilty and ashamed for being white, what other explanation could there be for people applauding their own destruction?
 
This country is too far gone.

I don't believe it is possible to bring about significant racial improvement in anything remotely similiar to the current political climate we are in.

There are only two ways out of this mess, either an all out race war, or a limited nuclear war.

So come on North Korea, or China, why don't you nuke our large cities where minorities tend to congregate, and then we can start over from scratch, as long as you don't forget to nuke D.C. as well...

Or maybe some "terrorists" can get some small nukes from Russia on the black market.
 
You see it does go back to supremacy. Being the ethnic minority in America merely means you will sooner or later lose political and social dominance over the country, not racial destruction. To value your race running the country is to consider them supreme and the argument that White people built this country is a moot point it does not belong to White Americans it belongs to Americans. Maybe when Whites are a minority their ethnic interest groups will gain validity. I do not buy the belief that the White race is so fragile that if they aren't running the country they inhabit that they are doomed. Forget Zimbabwe and South Africa there are White minorities in countries all over the world and they aren't being discriminated against on a mass scale.

I do agree that it is peculiar for White Americans to applaud becoming a minority, it is not something to fear and dread but it is also not something to shout and cheer about, it just is.

You always hear the notion that White people are the world minority. That is a silly thing to make a big deal about because Blacks are a world minority as well. If you are going by White vs. non-White yes naturally people of color outnumber Whites when considering indegenious land distribution and climate variation that is to be expected but when going by ethnic groups there are far smaller minorities than people considered to be White and Black.

"There is very little difference between the dems and repubs, in the sense that they are both promoting the destruction of the white race."

Then your claim of opposing non-White immigration because of values especially political ones holds no validity because the vast majority of White Americans vote either Democrat or Republican. You've made it clear that population is of major concern. WNs always complain about low birth rates which people of color are in no way responsible for if Whites want to maintain a higher birth rate then they need to start making policies to have more kids. That is an economic issue White people are having less kids because of the lifestyles they want to lead, more kids = more expense whereas some time ago more kids equaled more workers to do house chores.

I think racial separation is ultimately, fundamentally supremacist because when you get down to it the reasons for doing it will always come to you putting your race on a pedastal or denigrating another race to justify separation.
 
My oppososition to non-white immigration still has validity, because I think we have an obligation to at least try to bring about change in a legal fashion, even if I think it is highly unlikely to happen.

We do need people like the minutemen to at least get out there and try, even if it's like David going anainst Goliath.

I used to believe we stood a good chance that way, until I learned that in the amount of time it took to get one minor political victory, probably a million more non-whites streamed into the country, they are not going to be sympathetic to the white race when/if whites do become a minority, there will never be affirmative action for whites.

The plight of whites in South Africa is the greatest example of where this country is heading, whites are a minority there, and yet there is still discrimination favoring non-whites!
 
South Africa is a unique country with a unique history. White people live in just about every country in the world and they are not being discriminated against everywhere or even in most places. Blacks Africans suffered 300 years of apartheid in South Africa and then were given control of the country. You can't get rid of resentment that quickly being historically victimized does not turn a group of people into saints, it is only natural that they retaliate against White people. I am in no way saying they are getting what they deserved I am just saying it is not surprising. More importantly no parallel can be made between two countires with completely different histories. If America continues to value and uphold the principles of freedom and equality for all citizens then the ruling class will uphold those principles. There will be discrimination, there is still discrimination against people of color today. But how the country is run depends on how minimal that discrimination is.

As far as the minutemen are concerned they oppose illegal immigration. I don't have much problem with vigilantes if the government is not doing enough to stop an illegal crisis it is up to the citizens to defend themselves. Opposing legal immigration of a group of people into a country is hateful, plan and simple. I think the only rational solution would be to create tougher immigrarion laws period and make it harder for anyone to get in regardless of race. We do not need anymore hateful exclusion acts such as the Chinese Exclusion Act or in this hypothetical case the Non-White Exclusion Act.

One thing is for sure, if White people become the minority in America it will not be good for people who hold racist beliefs such as White Nationalists.

You all should learn the value of getting along. Can't we all just get along?
 
"So come on North Korea, or China, why don't you nuke our large cities where minorities tend to congregate, and then we can start over from scratch, as long as you don't forget to nuke D.C. as well...

Or maybe some "terrorists" can get some small nukes from Russia on the black market."


I hope you are being sarcastic because that is a terrible thing to say. Is your separatist ideology so important to you that you have to promote mass destruction, terrorism and death for hope of getting it achieved?
 
A friend of mine is German, and is trying to find a way to live legally in the USA. Since you want to stop immigration, do you feel that he should not be allowed to reside in the US too, or only certain people should not be allowed?

My feeling is that you don't consider all people when you put on your 'Stop Immigration' shirt, and because you are so bloody narrow minded and stupid, you are only thinking of selectively stopping immigration. Why don't you change the t-shirt and signs from 'Stop Immagration' to 'Selectively Stop Immigration?'
 
Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?